Enhancing operative documentation of emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and development of a synoptic reporting template.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, operative reports are narrative and often handwritten, making interpretation difficult and potentially omitting key steps of the procedure. This study undertook a systematic review to determine the current availability of synoptic operative reporting and develop a synoptic operative record template for emergency laparotomy (EL). METHODS: A PROSPERO registered study from January 1st, 2012, to December 31st, 2022, was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023. KEYWORDS: emergency laparotomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR documentation OR report OR pro forma OR narrative OR synoptic OR digital OR audio-visual. Studies on paediatric or pregnant patients, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, editorial comments, and letters were excluded. A synoptic operative record was designed to include key standards in the documentation, as suggested by the Colleges of Surgeons. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 4687 articles, and no relevant published articles were found. A detailed synoptic template was developed, which included 111 fields related to patient demographics, operative findings, interventions, and documentation of key variables associated with patient outcomes. 11 were text boxes, two were related to digital audio-visual uploads, and three facilitated the digital scoring/grading of findings. CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified a limited number of publications reporting synoptic operative reporting, and none related to emergency laparotomy. This novel operative template provides a platform for clear documentation of the surgery performed during emergency laparotomy, potentially facilitating data analysis, resident training, and research, in turn leading to a better understanding of patient outcomes.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Hyperbilirubinemia in Predicting Appendicitis and Appendiceal Perforation.

Background Every diagnostic tool that may assist in the identification of appendicitis is of great importance to emergency general surgeons. While recent research has indicated that hyperbilirubinemia can serve as a valuable predictor of appendiceal perforation, these studies have not specifically examined the role of bilirubin as an indicator for acute appendicitis. This study aimed to assess the role of hyperbilirubinemia as a diagnostic factor in detecting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Methodology This single-center retrospective study involved 333 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent an emergency appendectomy at a model three hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA/SE 18.0 for Windows (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) to compare bilirubin levels, white blood cell count (WCC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) among normal appendices, non-perforated appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis. Results Among 333 patients, 60.66% were male, and 39.34% were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.54:1. The average hospital stay was 3.27 ± 3.02 days. Hyperbilirubinemia was observed in 25.53% (85 individuals). Among the 51 cases of perforated appendicitis, 70.59% had elevated bilirubin levels of above 20 µmol/L. Significantly more patients with appendiceal perforation had hyperbilirubinemia than non-perforated appendicitis (70.59% vs. 19.03%, p < 0.001). Bilirubin had higher specificity (94.29%) for detecting non-perforated appendicitis than normal appendices (odds ratio = 3.88), while WCC and CRP showed higher sensitivities. WCC had a sensitivity of 73.28% and a specificity of 42.86%, and CRP had a sensitivity of 76.53% and a specificity of 60.00%. When comparing perforated appendicitis with non-perforated appendicitis, bilirubin showed a specificity of 80.97% and an odds ratio of 10.21. The likelihood of a patient with hyperbilirubinemia having perforated appendicitis was more than 10 times higher than those without appendiceal perforation, suggesting it to be a potential indicator for appendiceal perforation. WCC showed a specificity of 26.72% and an odds ratio of 4.28, while CRP had a specificity of 23.48% and an odds ratio of 4.91. Conclusions The significant association between bilirubin levels and appendicitis highlights its potential as a valuable marker for predicting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. The simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and diagnostic value of bilirubin assessment support its routine use in suspected cases of acute appendicitis.

Implementation of World Health Organization behaviorally anchored rating scale and checklist utilization: promising results for LMICs.

Background: Operating teams can decrease the likelihood of patient risk by using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. To ascertain the impact of demographic factors on behaviorally anchored ratings and investigate operating room (OR) staff attitudes toward checklist administration, we set out to better understand how OR personnel use the checklist in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Materials and methods: A monocentric sequential mixed-methods study employing a quantitative approach of using World Health Organization Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS) assessments of surgical cases by OR personnel and two independent observers, who were certified surgeons having extensive experience in the rating of the WHOBARS scale for more than 1 year, followed by a qualitative approach of staff interviews were carried out in a tertiary care setting. In June and July 2022, over the period of 8 weeks, an intervention (training delivery) was implemented and evaluated. The information, skills, and behavior adjustments required to apply the checklist were taught in the course using lectures, videos, small group breakouts, participant feedback, and simulations. Results: After the introduction of WHOBARS, 50.81% of respondents reported always using the checklist, with another 30.81% using it in part. Participants' years in practice, hospital size, or surgical volume did not predict checklist use. Checklist use was associated with always counting instruments (51.08%), patient identity (67.83%), difficult intubation risk (39.72%), the risk of blood loss (51.08%), prophylactic administration of an antibiotic (52.43%), and the use of pulse oximeter (46.75%). Interviewees felt that the checklist could promote teamwork and a safe culture, particularly enabling speaking up. Senior staff were of key importance in setting the appropriate tone. Conclusion: The use of a multi-disciplinary course for checklist implementation resulted in 50.81% of participants always using the checklist and an increase in counting surgical instruments. Successful checklist implementation was not predicted by the participant's length of medical service, hospital size, or surgical volume. If reproducible in other countries, widespread implementation in LMICs becomes a realistic possibility.

Screening of four signature genes for clinical testing through bioinformatics and in vitro methods in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) is the 6th most common cancer around the globe; its underlying molecular mechanisms and accurate molecular markers are still lacking. In this study, we explored hub genes and their potential signaling pathways through which these genes participate in the development of HNSC. The GSE23036 gene microarray dataset was attained from the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database. Hub genes were identified via the Cytohubba plug-in application of the Cytoscape. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets and cell lines (HOK and FuDu) were used to evaluate expression variations in the hub genes. Moreover, promoter methylation, genetic alteration, gene enrichment, miRNA network, and immunocyte infiltration analysis were also performed to confirm the oncogenic role and biomarker potential of the hub genes in HNSC patients. Based on the hub gene analysis results, four hub genes, including KNTC1 (Kinetochore Associated 1), CEP55 (Centrosomal protein of 55 kDa), AURKA (Aurora A Kinase), and ECT2 (Epithelial Cell Transforming 2), with the highest degree scores were denoted as hub genes. All these four genes were significantly up-regulated in HNSC clinical samples and cell lines relative to their counterparts. Overexpression of KNTC1, CEP55, AURKA, and ECT2 was also associated with poor survival and various clinical parameters of the HNSC patients. Methylation analysis through targeted bisulfite sequencing of HOK and FuDu cell lines revealed that the overexpression of KNTC1, CEP55, AURKA, and ECT2 hub genes was due to their promoter hypomethylation. Moreover, higher expressions of KNTC1, CEP55, AURKA, and ECT2 were positively correlated with the abundance of the CD4+ T cells and macrophage while with the reduction of CD8+ T cells in HNSC samples. Finally, gene enrichment analysis showed that all hub genes are involved in "nucleoplasm, centrosome, mitotic spindle, and cytosol" pathways. In conclusion, the KNTC1, CEP55, AURKA, and ECT2 genes could be potential biomarkers for HNSC patients and provide a novel insight into the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Frequency and Causes of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Spinal Injury Reported at Two Major Tertiary Care Hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Introduction Spinal cord injury, due to traumatic or non-traumatic causes, is a medically challenging and life-disrupting condition. The injury disrupts neural signaling and is a medical emergency requiring immediate treatment that can reduce long-term effects like paralysis or partial disability of the body. It has costly consequences both for individuals and families because it causes not only physical disability but dependency on others. The main objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of spinal injuries, their nature, and their causes. Materials and methods A descriptive exploratory study was conducted in the neurosurgery wards of two major hospitals of Peshawar, Lady Reading Hospital and Hayatabad Medical Complex. Necessary permission was taken from the administration of both hospitals before starting data collection. The duration of the study was three months, from October to December 2014. A total of 768 patients were retrieved from the ward records for 2013, from which a 50% random sample was taken (384 patients) while incomplete patient records were excluded. The data were transferred and recorded on a pre-constructed proforma covering all the required variables of the study. Finally, the data were transferred to SPSS 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago) for analysis of descriptive statistics. In addition, comparisons were done by gender, hospitals, types of injuries, and causes of injuries. The chi-square test was used to compare groups for significant differences in frequencies, keeping p ≤0.05 as significant. Results Major factors for spinal cord injury were traumatic and non-traumatic. This study revealed that out of the total patients, 35% faced trauma as a cause of spinal disorder out of which 42%, 29%, and 21% were sudden falls, road traffic accidents (RTAs), and weight lifting, respectively. While non-traumatic causes were 52% mostly due to congenital anomalies (24%), stenosis (23%), and tumor (12%). Levels most commonly involved were lumbar (42.3%) followed by patients involving multiple levels (32.52%), L5-S1 (20.87%), thoracic (2.42%), and cervical (1.92%). Conclusions The traumatic injury was the leading cause of spinal cord injury in the present study where RTAs and falls contributed the most. Congenital abnormalities and spinal cord stenosis were more frequent among non-traumatic spinal cord injuries. The surgical approach was the only way of management practiced for spinal cord injuries in both of the tertiary care hospitals.

Comparative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer poses a significant clinical challenge that necessitates effective therapeutic interventions. Radical cystectomy is a primary treatment option, but a comprehensive understanding of its outcomes is crucial for informed clinical decision-making. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate and summarize the outcomes associated with radical cystectomy as a primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a focus on survival rates, complications, and quality of life. A systematic search across databases-PubMed, Google Scholar, and others-covered studies from 2017 onwards. Included were studies reporting survival rates, complications, and quality of life post-radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, including randomized controlled trials, cohort, and observational studies. Multidimensional analysis revealed promising findings regarding the efficacy of radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Survival outcomes, including overall survival and disease-specific mortality, have demonstrated significant improvements, particularly in recent randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Complications associated with the surgical procedure, such as positive surgical margins and lymph node yields, were generally acceptable. Quality of life outcomes post-radical cystectomy exhibited positive trends, although variations were noted in the emotional and social domains. This review underscores radical cystectomy's role in enhancing overall survival and reducing disease-specific mortality in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Despite reported complications, recent studies support its acceptable risk profile. Detailed examination of various factors contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the procedure. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment approaches in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, considering both oncological efficacy and perioperative outcomes. Radical cystectomy remains fundamental in urological oncology, with ongoing advancements refining its significance.

Angiotensinogen, a promising gene signature for rectum and stomach adenocarcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVES: Angiotensinogen (AGT), as a component of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is one of the major risk factors for cancer development. To date, there has not been a systematic pan-cancer analysis of AGT. METHODS: This pan-cancer study comprehensively investigated AGT in 24 different cancers based on the UALCAN, KM plotter, GENT2, HPA, MEXPRESS, cBioportal, STRING, TIMER, and CTD databases. RESULTS: The results showed that AGT was highly expressed in most tumors, and AGT overexpression may be related to the worst survival of Rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) and Stomach Adenocarcinoma (STAD) patients only. Furthermore, pathway analysis indicated that AGT-associated genes are involved in six critical pathways. Moreover, the higher expression of AGT was found to be detrimental to the promoter methylation level (P<0.05), immune cells infiltration (P<0.05), and genetic alterations. We have also predicted various chemotherapeutic drugs contributing to the expression regulation of AGT. CONCLUSION: Our results together support that AGT is a possible biomarker for READ and STAD.